1) 425/2019 Const. P. Sharaf Shipping Agency (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SALES TAX
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-20


2) 1329/2016 Const. P. BYCO PETROLEUM PAKISTAN LTD (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20


3) 1330/2016 Const. P. BYCO OIL PAKISATN LTD (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SALES TAX
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20


4) 2516/2016 Const. P. Tapal Tea Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SALES TAX
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20


5) 404/2020 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector of Customs (Applicant) V/S M/s. Euro Tiles & Granites (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:CUSTOM MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


6) 3240/2020 Const. P. Shoe Planet Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S The Collector of Custom and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:CUSTOM MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20


7) 7255/2017 Const. P. Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SALES TAX
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20


8) 2983/2020 Const. P. M/s Ahsan Enterprises (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:CUSTOM MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-20


9) 3912/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Dabeer Hussain Shah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:CUSTOM MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-20


10) 3541/2017 Const. P. Unilever Paksitan Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan and Os (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:INVESTIGATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20


11) 2867/2018 Const. P. Van Oord Dredging Contractors B.V. (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:INCOME TAX
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-20


12) 328/2020 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD YOUSUF KADANI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:CANCELLATION OF BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


13) 85/2020 Suit Touqeer Ahmed (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Younus Lakhani & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


14) 8633/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Ali Bhatia (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973. A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, has pronounced the judgment on 09.10.2020 in the case of Ghulam Ali Bhatia & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with connected petitions), whereby, the petitioners have expressed their grievance against impugned amendment in SRO 583/2017 dated 01.07.2017, for being discriminatory, as according to petitioners, the concession and reduction in payment of duty and taxes to the Ship Breaking Industry in respect of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap is violative of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, whereas, a declaration has been sought to the effect that petitioners, who are the importers and manufacturers of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap, may be given the similar concession/reduction in tax liability as according to the petitioners, they fall within the same class of persons. The aforesaid petitions have been dismissed by the Divisional Bench of this Court while holding that petitioners, who are importers of re-rollable and re-meltable scrap are covered under PCT Heading 7204.4910, whereas, ship (vessel) imported by the Ship Breaking Industry are covered under PCT Heading 8909.0000, hence cannot be treated at par. It has been further held that through impugned amendment, reduction of tax liability has been granted as an incentive for the revival of ship breaking industry pursuant to policy decision, whereas, there seems no legal impropriety in the impugned amendment. No additional liability or burden has been created through impugned amendment, in violation of constitutional provisions or the law, therefore, the allegation of discrimination amongst the same class of person is otherwise misconceived. Reliance has been placed in the case of Messrs Elahi Cotton Mills Ltd. and others vs. Federation of Pakistan and others (PLD 1997 SC 582), wherein, it has been held as under:- "(vi) That the tests of the vice of discrimination in a taxing law are less rigorous. If there is equality and uniformity within each group founded on intelligible differentia having a rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved by the law, the Constitutional mandate that a law should not be discriminatory is fulfilled."
Read more
Matter:SALES TAX
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan
Order Date: 09-OCT-20

15) 28/2019 Const. P. Arsalan Aijaz (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Sanober & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


16) 103/2020 Const. P. Anjleena (Petitioner) V/S S.S.P Umerkot & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


17) 217/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) V/S Haresh Kumar & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


18) 348/2020 Const. P. Mst. Jannat Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


19) 363/2010 Const. P. Pir Muhammad Hassan Qadir (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad S/O Amoon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


20) 372/2020 Const. P. Mst. Majdan & another (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


21) 438/2020 Const. P. Dheraj @ Wanio (Petitioner) V/S Sht. Surma & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


22) 730/2019 Const. P. Mst. Shakeela (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Arif Abbasi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


23) 865/2019 Const. P. Atta Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Nazia & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


24) 36/2016 I. A M/s. House Building Finance Co. Ltd. (Appellant) V/S The Judge Banking Court No. IV Karachi & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BANKING
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-20


25) 24/2018 H.C.A Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Jawed Pervaiz Enterprises (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Arbitration Law
Tag Line:

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) issued by the Company can be considered as directions /instructions with a binding effect provided it is not violative of fundamental principles of law
Read more
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 30-SEP-20

26) 428/2018 H.C.A Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S M/s. Data Stee Pipe Industries Pvt Ltd. & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


27) 4622/2020 Const. P. Ms. Mashal Khalidi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST NOTIFICATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


28) 24/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Malook & Ors (Applicant) V/S Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


29) 56/2015 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Wahid (Applicant) V/S Punhoon (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


30) 122/2011 R.A (Civil Revision) Mola Bux & Ors (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


31) 405/2020 Const. P. Mst. Dr. Nazia Iram & another (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


32) 618/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Aslam & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


33) 2481/2019 Const. P. M/s DXN International Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SALES TAX
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-OCT-20


34) 3045/2018 Const. P. Prism Premium - Losungen & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:CUSTOM MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)
Order Date: 23-OCT-20


35) 69/2013 Civil Revision Zulfiqar Ali Channa (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Rafique (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-20


36) 384/2020 Const. P. Sarfaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-20


37) 790/2018 Const. P. Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) V/S GOS & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
differently abled persons' plea for appointment in the quota reserved for such persons--We are of the view that the Chief Secretary Sindh, being the senior most officer in the Province, would be the most suitable person to oversee the entire process under his personal supervision in order to ensure not only the compliance of this Court???s orders, but also to conclude the exercise in relation to those petitioners whose cases have not yet been considered and/or finalized--To ensure that appointment orders are received by all the 102 (81 + 21) petitioners, before the next date of hearing, who have been already recommended for appointment --To ensure that cases of all such petitioners in these petitions, that have not yet been considered and/or finalized, are considered on merits, strictly in accordance with law, and after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to them a speaking order is passed by the competent authority before the next date of hearing in relation to every such petitioner who is rejected for appointment --To ensure that all those petitioners who have been or will be recommended and have been / will be issued appointment orders are allowed to join their duties before the next date of hearing after completion of all codal formalities--To communicate this order to all the relevant departments and their Secretaries with direction to ensure implementation and compliance thereof in letter and spirit within the stipulated period.
Tag Line:

differently abled persons' plea for appointment in the quota reserved for such persons--We are of the view that the Chief Secretary Sindh, being the senior most officer in the Province, would be the most suitable person to oversee the entire process under his personal supervision in order to ensure not only the compliance of this Court???s orders, but also to conclude the exercise in relation to those petitioners whose cases have not yet been considered and/or finalized--To ensure that appointment orders are received by all the 102 (81 + 21) petitioners, before the next date of hearing, who have been already recommended for appointment --To ensure that cases of all such petitioners in these petitions, that have not yet been considered and/or finalized, are considered on merits, strictly in accordance with law, and after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to them a speaking order is passed by the competent authority before the next date of hearing in relation to every such petitioner who is rejected for appointment --To ensure that all those petitioners who have been or will be recommended and have been / will be issued appointment orders are allowed to join their duties before the next date of hearing after completion of all codal formalities--To communicate this order to all the relevant departments and their Secretaries with direction to ensure implementation and compliance thereof in letter and spirit within the stipulated period.
Read more
Matter:APPOINTMENT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-OCT-20

38) 1051/2019 Const. P. Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
employees of KDA whose pension and other post-retirement benefits have been stopped or delayed by KDA--According to the report, public notice in terms of order dated 19.03.2020 was published in newspapers on 27.08.2020 ; a total amount of Rs.234,749,894.00 is payable by KDA to its retired employees ; and, an amount of Rs.23,741,450.00, being 10% amount of the pension and post-retirement benefits, has been paid by KDA to its 988 retired employees. Learned counsel for the petitioners have expressed some reservations with regard to the contents of the above compliance report and state that the orders of this Court have not been complied with by KDA in letter and spirit. The above named Director Finance & Accounts KDA is directed to produce before this Court on the next date of hearing the complete bank statement of the bank account opened by KDA for the above purpose in pursuance of the order dated 19.03.2020.
Tag Line:

employees of KDA whose pension and other post-retirement benefits have been stopped or delayed by KDA--According to the report, public notice in terms of order dated 19.03.2020 was published in newspapers on 27.08.2020 ; a total amount of Rs.234,749,894.00 is payable by KDA to its retired employees ; and, an amount of Rs.23,741,450.00, being 10% amount of the pension and post-retirement benefits, has been paid by KDA to its 988 retired employees. Learned counsel for the petitioners have expressed some reservations with regard to the contents of the above compliance report and state that the orders of this Court have not been complied with by KDA in letter and spirit. The above named Director Finance & Accounts KDA is directed to produce before this Court on the next date of hearing the complete bank statement of the bank account opened by KDA for the above purpose in pursuance of the order dated 19.03.2020.
Read more
Matter:PENSION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 22-OCT-20

39) 1725/2012 Const. P. M/S shadman Cotton Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Jabbar and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 22-OCT-20


40) 825/2016 Const. P. Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-20


41) 923/2020 Cr.Bail SYED RIAZUL HASSAN @ RAJU PAPA (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-20


42) 958/2020 Cr.Bail Akash and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 21-OCT-20


43) 4483/2020 Const. P. Pakistan International Airline Corp Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 21-OCT-20


44) 5124/2020 Const. P. M/s Farkhunda Yasmeen (Petitioner) V/S Secretary, M/o Interior & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
Order Date: 21-OCT-20


45) 566/2020 Cr.Misc. Mst. Najma (Applicant) V/S SSP District SBA and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20


46) 957/2020 Cr.Bail Shrimati gulali (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20


47) 963/2020 Cr.Bail ZAHID HUSSAIN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20


48) 3119/2017 Const. P. Ali Bux & Others (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Haleem & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 20-OCT-20


49) 19/2019 Const. P. Sikandar Ali Malah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


50) 88/2020 Cr.Misc. ALI DINO MALLAH (Applicant) V/S IIND EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


51) 165/2019 Cr.Rev NIZAM UDDIN & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


52) 299/2020 Cr.Misc. Fateh Uddin (Applicant) V/S Learned ADJ Hala & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


53) 301/2012 Criminal Appeal Arab s/o Allah Rakhio @ Rakhial (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


54) 440/2020 Cr.Misc. MALIK MUHAMMAD ZAHID (Applicant) V/S LEARNED A.D.J II KOTRI & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


55) 943/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Rasool & another (Petitioner) V/S Jawaid Ali & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


56) 4224/2013 Const. P. Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


57) 5909/2019 Const. P. Sajid Jalil (Petitioner) V/S N.B.P and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-OCT-20


58) 3/2012 II.A. Cotton Export Corporation of Pak & Others (Appellant) V/S M/S. Rab Razi Cotton Ginning (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20


59) 139/2011 Civil Revision Haji Muhammad Ismail Qureshi (Applicant) V/S Mst: Ramzano and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20


60) 223/2005 Civil Revision Ibrahim (Applicant) V/S LAL and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20


61) 537/2020 Cr.Misc. SAFAR ALI (Applicant) V/S FAYAZ & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20


62) 5273/2019 Const. P. Noor Muhammad Daudpota and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review.
Tag Line:

regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review.
Read more
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20

63) 6632/2019 Const. P. Fareed Ali and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review.
Tag Line:

regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review.
Read more
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-20

64) 240/2013 Const. P. Punhal and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-20


65) 296/2020 Cr.Misc. Sht Ram Pyari (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-20


66) 316/2020 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Shakir (Applicant) V/S SP Complaint Cell Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-20


67) 2889/2020 Const. P. Ahmed Kehar (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74.
Tag Line:

We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74.
Read more
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-20

68) 6908/2018 Const. P. Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) V/S The Registrar High Court of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 15-OCT-20


69) 242/2019 Const. P. Mst. Farah Azeem (Petitioner) V/S Syed Sami Hyder & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20


70) 869/2019 Const. P. Nadir Ali (Petitioner) V/S M.D STEVTA and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service.
Tag Line:

Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service.
Read more
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20

71) 1400/2017 Const. P. Syed Noor ul Arfeen Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:REGULARIZATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20


72) 6046/2017 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa Daudpota (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984.
Tag Line:

The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984.
Read more
Matter:SERVICE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 14-OCT-20

73) 1099/2020 Const. P. Muhammad Siddique An Others (Petitioner) V/S Ali Ahmed And Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-20


74) 3636/2016 Const. P. Abdullah Shah Ghazi sugar Mills (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-20


75) 4941/2020 Const. P. Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine.
Tag Line:

PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine.
Read more
Matter:INSURANCE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 13-OCT-20

76) 16/2017 I. A Sultan through LRs. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Mateen (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


77) 17/2018 M.A. Mir Ishfaque Ahmed & Others (Appellant) V/S Altaf Hussain & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


78) 91/2020 Const. P. Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) V/S 5th ADJ Hyd & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


79) 94/2019 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Ibrahim (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


80) 202/2020 Cr.Misc. Nazar Ali (Applicant) V/S Ld. Session Judge Badin (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


81) 281/2020 Cr.Misc. Gul Hassan (Applicant) V/S Ld. Session Judge Umerkot & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


82) 825/2020 Cr.Bail SAJAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


83) 991/2017 Const. P. Mst. Uzma Tabassum (Petitioner) V/S Anjum Jawaid & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


84) 1243/2015 Suit M/s. Mashal Welfare Foundation (Plaintiff) V/S The Province of Sindh & others (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DECLARATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20


85) 4905/2020 Const. P. M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
Tag Line:

The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
Read more
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20

86) 4906/2020 Const. P. M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
Tag Line:

The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
Read more
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20

87) 4907/2020 Const. P. M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fareed and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
Tag Line:

The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine.
Read more
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 12-OCT-20

88) 11/2001 Cr.Acctt.A Mian Waqar Akhtar Paganwala (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal.
Tag Line:

Thus based on the discussion made hereinabove we are of the considered view that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against the appellant by producing reliable, trustworthy, and confidence-inspiring oral evidence as well as documentary evidence in support of the same. We, therefore, uphold all the sentences, fines, and penalties for each offence in the judgment whilst dismissing the appeal.
Read more
Matter:IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20

89) 28/2008 Civil Revision Muhammad Naseer and others (Applicant) V/S H.M.C. and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


90) 73/2018 Cr.Acctt.A MUHAMMAD ASIF ARSHAD S/O MUHAMMAD ARSHAD (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:IMPRISONMENT ABOVE 7 YEARS
Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


91) 75/2018 Cr.Acctt.A MUMTAZ ALI NIZAMANI S/O LAL DINO NIZAMANI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:IMPRISONMENT UPTO 7 YEARS
Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


92) 82/1985 F.R.A Shahzaman (Appellant) V/S Haji Ghulam Hyder & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


93) 109/2020 Cr.J.A MUHAMMAD ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


94) 172/2020 Const. P. Malik Faraz Ahmed & others (Petitioner) V/S Agha Khursheed Ahmed & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


95) 173/2016 Const. P. Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Jithendra & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


96) 174/2015 Civil Revision Azizullah and others (Applicant) V/S Zulifqar Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


97) 174/2016 Const. P. Ameen Kharani (Petitioner) V/S Jithendra & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


98) 175/2016 Const. P. Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Jithendra & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


99) 176/2016 Const. P. Akber Kharani (Petitioner) V/S Jithendra & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


100) 177/2016 Const. P. Barkat Ali (Petitioner) V/S Jithendra & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


101) 178/2015 Civil Revision Ghulam Hyder and 10 others (Applicant) V/S Zulfiqar Ali and 13 others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


102) 178/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Jithendra & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


103) 574/2011 Const. P. Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) V/S District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


104) 575/2011 Const. P. Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) V/S District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


105) 719/2011 Const. P. Abdul Ali & another (Petitioner) V/S District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


106) 720/2011 Const. P. Akbar Allauddin & another (Petitioner) V/S District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


107) 721/2011 Const. P. Abdul Manan (Petitioner) V/S District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


108) 4873/2020 Const. P. Check & Watch Enviromental Foundation (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DIRECTION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


109) 5378/2019 Const. P. Shahenshah Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


110) 6795/2019 Const. P. Waqar Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


111) 7188/2019 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Memon (Petitioner) V/S D.G NAB and Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


112) 7439/2019 Const. P. Abdul Fattah Daudpoto (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


113) 7482/2019 Const. P. Abdul Majeed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


114) 7496/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Azam (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


115) 7707/2019 Const. P. Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20


116) 7761/2018 Const. P. Roshan Ali Kanasiro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed.
Tag Line:

We may observe here that while deciding bail petitions an elaborate sifting of evidence cannot be made but only a tentative assessment is permissible and a cursory glance of the record shows that all the petitioners in connivance with each other have misappropriated a huge amount of money from the Government from which some amount was recovered through plea bargains. Under these circumstances the interim pre-arrest bail granted to all the petitioners earlier by this court is recalled with immediate effect. We also find that with regard to petitioner Shahenshah Hussain who is seeking his post-arrest bail there is sufficient evidence against him in the shape of documentary evidence which connects him to the commission of offence to which he has been charged and therefore his petition for post-arrest bail is also dismissed.
Read more
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Hon'be Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-20

117) 979/2020 Const. P. Abdul Azeem Khan (Petitioner) V/S The State & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-OCT-20


118) 983/2020 Const. P. Kewal Ram (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-OCT-20


119) 993/2020 Const. P. Kamla (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-OCT-20


120) 998/2020 Const. P. Jalil Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 08-OCT-20


121) 22/2016 Conf.Case Abdul Razzak (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-20


122) 125/2016 Criminal Appeal Abdul Razzak (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-20


123) 10/2016 Conf.Case Ghulam Rasool (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


124) 53/2016 Criminal Appeal Ghulam Rasool (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


125) 126/2017 Criminal Appeal Taimoor Badshah and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


126) 290/2017 Criminal Appeal Taimoor Badshah (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


127) 292/2017 Criminal Appeal Khurram Shahzad (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


128) 715/2020 Const. P. MUHAMMAD Juman (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


129) 918/2020 Const. P. Nadir Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


130) 1738/2012 Const. P. Nizamuddin (Petitioner) V/S WAPDA, and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


131) 2434/2019 Const. P. Khan Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


132) 6736/2018 Const. P. Francis S. Paul (Petitioner) V/S John Paul & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 06-OCT-20


133) 10/2001 Civil Revision Muhammad Mekyle (Applicant) V/S Saindad &ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


134) 13/2001 Civil Revision Muhammad Moosa &ORs (Applicant) V/S Saindad &ORs (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


135) 64/2020 Cr.Acq.A. SYED RAZA ABBAS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


136) 134/2002 Civil Revision Haji Jamaluddin (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


137) 154/2006 Civil Revision Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Khadim Hussain and other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


138) 467/2020 Criminal Miscelleneous MST.MAREENA (Petitioner) V/S S.S.P DISTT.THATTA & OTHERS (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


139) 546/2010 Const. P. Mst. Zahida Haroon (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Ashique and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


140) 772/2020 Cr.Bail Ayaz (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


141) 7681/2019 Const. P. Sharqa Jan Magsi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:ADMISSION MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
Order Date: 05-OCT-20


142) 27/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Achar & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-20


143) 961/2020 Const. P. Rustam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Dr Sikandar Ali & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-20


144) 1029/2020 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) V/S FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 01-OCT-20


145) 1/2017 Conf.Case Manzoor Ahmed (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


146) 3/2017 Cr.J.A Manzoor Ahmed (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


147) 747/2020 Const. P. Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


148) 978/2020 Const. P. Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


149) 1180/2019 Const. P. Mst. Zeenat Mehmood W/o Mehmood Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Farhat Fareed Khan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RENT MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


150) 1970/2019 Const. P. Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


151) 1982/2015 Const. P. Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 30-SEP-20


152) 12/2016 Criminal Appeal Poonjo & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


153) 14/2016 Cr.J.A Niaz Hussain Chachar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


154) 51/2020 Criminal Appeal ASGHAR (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


155) 74/2016 Cr.J.A Abdul Sattar & another (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


156) 222/2019 Cr.J.A Saleem (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


157) 659/2020 Cr.Bail Munawar Ali @ Teni (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


158) 877/2020 Const. P. Dad Muhammad Brohi (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


159) 3383/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Atif and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 29-SEP-20


160) 5/2017 I. A Nisar Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Syed Ashfaque Ali & anothers (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20


161) 38/2020 Cr.Rev Muhammad Akhtar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20


162) 378/2020 Const. P. Mst. Sawera & AOR. (Petitioner) V/S P.O. Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20


163) 398/2020 Const. P. Ghulam Rasool Babar (Petitioner) V/S Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20


164) 731/2020 Cr.Bail LIAQUAT ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20


165) 1410/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Jawed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shaista & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20


166) 2253/2020 Const. P. M/s Majeed & Sons Steel (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST NOTIFICATION / K-ELECTRIC
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 28-SEP-20


167) 29/2020 M.A. Roshan Ali Kanasro S/o Muhammad Safar (Appellant) V/S P.E.M.R.A. and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST DECISION OF PEMRA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


168) 58/2019 II.A. Balach (Appellant) V/S Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


169) 60/2019 II.A. Balach (Appellant) V/S Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


170) 102/2020 Criminal Appeal Gulab (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 25-SEP-20


171) 860/2017 Const. P. Mst. Haleema Bi Wd/O Gohar Shah (Late) (Petitioner) V/S Manzoor Ahmed Khan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RENT MATTER
Advocates:Zahid Hussain(4065),Mr Muhammad Ilyas Khan Tanoli()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 22-SEP-20


172) 55/2010 M.A. Gohar Manzoor FCA (Appellant) V/S Institute of Chartered Account of Pakistan (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:Against ICAP
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 21-SEP-20


173) 40/2020 S.M.A Rahim Buksh s/o Imam Buksh (Petitioner) V/S . (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 16-SEP-20


174) 32/2020 M.A. M/s. ARY Communications Pvt Ltd (Appellant) V/S Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST DECISION OF PEMRA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 15-SEP-20


175) 904/2018 Const. P. Mst. Rubina Kalam Elahi & others (Petitioner) V/S District & Session Judge Central Karachi & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Extension of time for vacation of rented premises due to covid-19. .
Tag Line:

RENT MATTER - CMA for extension of time.
Read more
Matter:RENT MATTER
Advocates:Saleem Khan()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author)
Order Date: 11-SEP-20

176) 301/2020 Cr.Bail Jalaluddin Bangulani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Muhammad Noonari()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-20


177) 339/2020 Cr.Bail Mehar Jan Sundrani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Muhammad Noonari(),Muhammad Ashique Dhamraho(),Abdul Ghani Bijarani()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-20


178) 348/2020 Cr.Bail Imtiaz @ Faqeera Jakhrani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Muhammad Noonari()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 10-SEP-20


179) 53/2011 Criminal Appeal Muhammad Ayoub Chijjan and ors (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Ali Anwar Kandhro(),Altaf Hussain Surahio()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 09-SEP-20


180) 32/2019 Criminal Appeal Muharam Gadehi & Others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Habibullah Ghauri(),Mr Muhammad Sharif(7957),Sajid Hussain Mahessar(),Ali Anwar Kandhro()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-20


181) 200/2020 Cr.Misc. Rano Khan Jeho Abro (Applicant) V/S SSP Shikarpur & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Aitbar Ali Bullo(),Abdul Rehman Bhutto(),Mr. Shahbaz Ali Brohi()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 07-SEP-20


182) 379/2020 Cr.Bail Mohammad Akbar Mengal (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Syed Fida Hussain Shah(),Muhammad Noonari()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 03-SEP-20


183) 295/2020 Cr.Bail Sardar Ali Jarwar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Muhammad Noonari()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 02-SEP-20


184) 325/2017 Const. P. Aijaz and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 27-AUG-20


185) 52/2018 Criminal Appeal Meer Muhammad Umer (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 19-AUG-20


186) 187/2020 Cr.Misc. Amanat Ali Mangi (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Hassan Wahan And Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana
Advocates:Ali Bux Mashori(),Aitbar Ali Bullo()
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 18-AUG-20


187) 613/2019 Cr.Misc. Abdul Wahab Abbasi & Others (Applicant) V/S P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad(Author)
Order Date: 10-AUG-20


188) 78/2007 H.C.A Fateh Sports Wear Ltd & Ors (Appellant) V/S Allied Bank of Pakistan Ltd (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam
Order Date: 07-AUG-20


189) 155/2019 Cr.J.A Ameer Shah (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author)
Order Date: 07-AUG-20


190) 2194/2013 Const. P. Muhammad Anwer and others (Petitioner) V/S Fouji Foundation Model School & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 06-AUG-20


191) 4658/2018 Const. P. Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Tag Line:

A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, has pronounced the judgment on 06.08.2020 in the case of Dewan Motors (Pvt) Ltd. and others v. Federation of Pakistan & others (along with connected petitions), wherein, the Hon'ble bench of Sindh High Court has been pleased to dispose of all the petitions in the following terms:- " (i) The impugned sub-section (2) of Section 221-A of the Customs Act, 1969, as added vide Finance Act, 2018, is ultra vires to the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as through impugned amendment the legislature has attempted to validate constitutional defect while making amendment in sub-section (3) of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1969, and issuance of SRO 1035(I)/2017 dated 16.10.2017, through Finance Act, 2017, however, without making the required constitutional amendment. (ii) The Regulatory Duty charged and collected pursuant to amendment in sub-section (3) of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1969, and issuance of SRO 1035(I)/2017, through Finance Act, 2017, has already been declared by the Divisional Bench of this Court in the case of Premier Systems (Pvt) Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2018 PTD 861), as illegal and unconstitutional in the light of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mustafa Impex, Karachi & others vs. The Government of Pakistan & others, (PLD 2016 SC 808), therefore, in the absence of any constitutional amendment, cannot be validated through subsequent amendment in law, while giving it retrospective effect in respect of past and closed transaction, therefore, no Regulatory Duty can be charged, collected or recovered for the period starting from the date of commencement of Finance Act, 2017 till the date of commencement of Finance Act, 2018. .
Read more
Matter:CUSTOM (RD)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
Order Date: 06-AUG-20

192) 212/2019 Criminal Appeal Parvaiz (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
1200 grams of charas appeal allowed
Tag Line:

1200 grams of charas appeal allowed
Read more
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 05-AUG-20

193) 656/2020 Suit M/s. Pak Steel Mills & another. (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SUIT FOR DECLERATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 30-JUN-20


194) 329/2020 Suit Danish Akhtar & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Directorate of Estate Projects & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:LAND MATTERS
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-20


195) 576/2020 Suit Sohail Ilahi & others. (Plaintiff) V/S Usman Elahi & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:ARBITRATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 11-JUN-20


196) 555/2020 Suit M/s Taj Medicos (Plaintiff) V/S Public Procurement Regulatory Authority & others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Topic: Auction
Matter:SUIT FOR DECLERATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 04-JUN-20


197) 2285/2020 Const. P. Mst Bisma Noreen/ Ammer Jahan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:AGAINST AMENDMENT ACT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
Order Date: 04-JUN-20


198) 977/2014 Suit Asim Jofa. (Plaintiff) V/S K.M.C. & Others. (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:DECLARATION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author)
Order Date: 01-JUN-20


199) 604/2020 Cr.Bail ZIAUDDIN GABOL S/O AMIN GABOL (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST
Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-20


200) 733/2003 Suit COL. (RETD) MUHAMMAD SHARIF (Plaintiff) V/S SQ. LDR. NOW LT. COL. (RETD) GHULAM FARI (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
Order Date: 29-MAY-20


201) 1409/2001 Suit TRADING CORP. OF PAK. PVT. LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S M/S. COX & KING AGENTS (Defendant)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:RECOVERY
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)
Order Date: 29-MAY-20


202) 598/2014 Const. P. Kamran Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Constitution of Pakistan
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-20


203) 3088/2018 Const. P. Mukhatiar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Shahdad Ali and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Topic: Transfer of Property Act 1882, Civil Procedure Code CPC, Constitution of Pakistan
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Faisal Kamal Alam(Author)
Order Date: 29-APR-20


204) 124/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Zafar Mobijo (Petitioner) V/S P.O SIndh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)
Order Date: 20-MAY-19